Empowering the Military by Lt Gen Prakash Katoch in IDR 3/3/2013http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/empowering-the-military/
Situations
in counter insurgency environment cause their own stress on soldiers
especially when politicians and officials play their dirty games.
Three
days after the operation, DC Kupwara (under militant threat, militant
sympathy or for money offered by militants) himself lodged an FIR that
the army had raped 100 women in that single night including a
60 year old woman.
How
do you insulate the soldier from unwarranted surmounting stress of
false accusations of serious crimes like rape including ignominy during
the attachments and long winded inquiries while media cries blue murder
and tarnishes the image of individual (s) and the Army? Can you gauge
the effect of undue additional stress levels caused by regular spate of
false human rights abuse allegations (94-95% as per NHCR) on soldiers in
addition to combat stress? During 1990-91, a village called Kushan
Pushpora in Kupwara District of J&K was searched during a winter
night of continuous snow and rain. More than one unit was involved.
Three days after the operation, DC Kupwara (under militant threat,
militant sympathy or for
money offered by militants) himself lodged an FIR that the army had
raped 100 women in that single night including a 60 year old woman. It
created a national and international furor. What followed was a spate of
commissions and inquiries, eventually all proving after a year plus
that the allegations were baseless.
More
recently, media frenzy and State politics in J&K accused army
personnel with the rape and killing two women at Shopian in J&K,
later proved to be a case of drowning. In insurgency areas, media too at
times is under terrorist threat or is available on hire – which may
perhaps be a global phenomenon. However, a former joint Director IB
writes in his book ‘Open Secrets’, “The
susceptibility of the fourth estate to the intelligence community had
tied our hands down. They are one of the too many holy Indian cows. Some
of them, as described by a senior member of the fourth estate, ‘taxi on
hire’. Any paymaster can hire this particular brand.”
…politicians continue to play their own games and actually enjoy the military being shown in poor light.
As
for insurgencies, neither the State nor the Centre actually have the
will, or shall we say desire to finish insurgency because of the
benefits that accrue – including unlimited funds sans accountability.
Therefore, politicians continue to play their own games and actually
enjoy the military being shown in poor light. So, where is the question
of clamping down on a lower functionary like DC Kupwara from making
false accusations or more importantly, take action against him when the
malicious FIR filed by him proved grossly wrong.
During
the obnoxious episode of General VK Singh, former Army Chief who
refused to toe the corrupt, the murky dealings of the
politician-bureaucrat-contractor mafia (land, arms and equipment) was
investigated and aired by ETV. This had similarly emerged when another
upright officer, Lieutenant General HS Panag, was shunted out from
Northern Command in 2008. Then you had ‘up for sale’ type of media
fellows, known to own properties beyond their means, who reported the
conspiracy of an army coup. A slimy colleague even put the photograph of
a serving military chief on the front cover, captioning it “Self Before
Service” without a care what would be the fallout on the military. He
was obviously rewarded handsomely by the mafia. This fellow would never
have the guts to write anything in a similar fashion against even a low
level police officer. The simple reason is that this
so called
editor knows that he would be bamboozled out of shape and breath should
he dare to do so. But one can play upon the military anyway which you
like, when the Defence Minister shrugs off saying his hands are tied and
the Supreme Commander refuses to even meet delegations of military
veterans with petitions written in blood and returning their medals
including gallantry awards. Take the recent VVIP Helicopter scam, where
media is focusing on a former military chief.
Do
they have the guts to interview the then DG Acquisition of MoD? Surely
the media is aware that the DG Acquisition is the lynchpin in any
procurement and is the man who negotiates pricing and that every time an
Empowered Committee flies out, the DG Acquisition or his
representatives, flies out separately from the rest of the committee,
stays separately while abroad, is the man whose signatures eventually
seals the deal and ensures the pre-decided booty distribution. Neha
Thirani wrote in the New York Times on 2nd April
2012, “Corruption in India’s Ministry of Defense runs deep and wide,
judging by the accusations made by defense officials in the past few
months. Maybe that shouldn’t be a surprise. In the frequent cases of
corruption that have surfaced in the ministry over the years, incidents
of graft have implicated everyone from petty officers to the highest
ranks in the department.”
“Corruption in India’s Ministry of Defense runs deep and wide, judging by the accusations made by defense officials in
the past few months. Maybe that shouldn’t be a surprise.
The
beauty of the set up is that the politician is dependent on the
bureaucrat for advice and the latter is not accountable and couldn’t
care less. That is why we don’t even have a National Security Strategy.
In 2005, a three star officer heading Headquarters Integrated Defence
Staff (IDS) was briefing the NSA on how the military can help draft the
National Security Strategy. After listening for about an hour, the NSA
abruptly cut off the presentation saying all this was fine but could he
be advised how to deal with Nepal? He was told that some five months
back a net assessment study on Nepal had been forwarded to him replete
with evaluation that events would play out in
Nepal in five phases, and that the second phase was under play right
now. The NSA was blank and admitted that he was not even aware of such a
document.
During
the first Indo-US DPG meeting held at New Delhi, the US delegation was
flabbergasted to know that our MoD has no personnel from the military on
permanent absorption or deputation. They wondered how our MoD could
function in the first place. More recently, The Centre for Strategic
& International Studies (CSIS), Washington, highlighted the “Indian Defence Ministry’s (MoD) inability to discuss policy and strategy.”
Antony as one of the longest serving Defence Minister is culpable of
not undoing the hawkish negative
bureaucratic control (without any expertise in military affairs) over
the military, excluding the military from crucial strategic
decision-making and not reviewing the entire rubric of higher defence
management and role of bureaucracy factoring the reports of scores of
committees – all of which adversely affects national security. He has
made no effort to remodel civil-military relations and has gone for
blacklisting firms at the first instance to push his clean image but
without making alternative procurement arrangements to fill up critical
deficiencies. He has not been able to remodel DRDO and the OFB and make
them accountable, bringing us to a sorry state where the military has to
import even assault rifles and carbines.
The
Defence
Minister (as the Prime Minister) may plead he is clean but he can
hardly dust off the reflection of the murky dealings by his
subordinates. That is the reason why HQ IDS has not been permitted to
integrate with the MoD – so that bureaucratic accountability can
continue to be avoided and more importantly the mafia links remain
dappled.
…why
HQ IDS has not been permitted to integrate with the MoD – so that
bureaucratic accountability can continue to be avoided and more
importantly the mafia links
remain dappled.
There
is a reason why today the MoD is being referred to as MAD (Ministry
Against Defence) and MoD’s bureaucrat headed Department of Ex-Servicemen
Welfare (DESW) called the Department of Stone Walling; ample proof of
the negative and adverse stance by both existing. The 4th Pay Commission
had granted military officers in 1986 rank pay (upto brigadier rank) in
addition to basic pay. The MoD bureaucrats scuttled these orders and in
conjunction the Controller of Defence Accounts deducted the rank pay
from emoluments of thousands of effected officers despite appeal after
appeal. It is only in September 2012, that the Supreme Court ordered
that the blocked rank pay. The bureaucracy then pleaded citing financial
constraints
that arrears get paid not with effect from 1986 not 2006, and at only
6% interest. The Supreme Court order that all disbursement be completed
within three months was circumvented on pretext of workload and
unavailability of records though lakhs of rupees were allotted years
back for automation of the Controller of Defence Accounts. Can you ever
expect the Defence Minister to conduct an inquiry into the culpability
of the bureaucrats of MoD for this gross injustice to the military or is
he and his predecessors party to all this? Will the present ‘clean’
Defence Minister do this even now knowing that some of the affected
officers have passed away, even martyred in conflict, and no arrears can
reach their next of kin when the Controller of Defence Accounts wants
every officer to submit a performa before any arrears can be allotted.
Ironically,
when the case of rank pay was being fought in court, the Solicitor
General of India told the court that Services Headquarters were opposed
to giving back the rank pay to these officers – blatant and malicious
lie to mislead the Court for which, he should have actually be held in
contempt and perjury. Payment of these arrears not with effect from 1986
but 2006 (20 years gap) and that too at only 6% interest implies
affected officers get perhaps only one third of what they should have
actually got. There are understandably financial constraints but do keep
in mind media reports of six paintings of the spouse of the ‘clean’
Defence Minister bought by Air India for Rupees 25 crores, even while
incurring a daily loss of Rupees 5 crores. Significantly, MoD accepted
that the Supreme Court judgment in rank pay case would involve
re-fixation of not
only the Fourth Pay Commission, but would affect successive pay
commissions. However, they have now refused to implement what they
admitted in court.
Just
about 20,000 officers are being given arrears, that too from 2006
instead of from 1986 instead of benefiting all pay scales and pensions
of service officers in all subsequent pay commissions. The Supreme Court
judgement in the rank pay case is actually being deliberately defrauded
by MoD through minimal implementation. The 6thPay
Commission granted Non Functional Advancement to all central services
officers but deliberately denied this to Defence Services. This is yet
another example of intentionally harming the military. The manner in
which the prestige of the military is being attacked and personnel
denied their emoluments is unbelievable. One fine morning, media
prominently displayed grossly false news – “OROP Sanctioned – Government
Allots 2300 Crores”. The President of Indian Ex-Servicemen Association
met the Defence Minister and points out the phoniness. The Defence
Minister acknowledged the folly (which was obviously deliberate) but did
nothing to ensure even a press note rectifying it. It
is not that the public is unconcerned. TR Ramaswami, former banker with
SBI Group and DSP Merrill Lynch Ltd writes, “We need a permanent
solution to this tussle over emoluments so that the armed forces need
only confront the enemies of the
nation.”
We neither have a National Security Strategy or an Internal Security Strategy
What
does the military do in such an environment? How can the military be
empowered? How do they get the much needed politico-military connect; to
make the politician concerned about the military, which in turn
would reign in the bureaucracy, improve civil-military relations and
bring the military into the inner hierarchical circle of all matters
military that would in turn improve national security? Frankly no
elaborate net assessment or appreciation is required. If you can
appreciate the solitary factor that makes the politician drool, you know
the panacea. Yes, unequivocally it is the votebank. The irony is that
provision already exists for the military to empower themselves through
this. The problem is that either the military is unaware or the
commanders are too scared they might be labeled ‘political’. Nothing can
be more stupid than the latter because exercising one’s franchise is a
democratic right and in fact, denying it to your subordinates is being
undemocratic where the Election Commission of India has authorized every
soldier who is serving for six months or more on the day of election in
any part of India to vote in the State elections (of
the State he is serving in) as well as the Municipal Elections of the
Municipality covering the place of the soldier’s current
posting.Deliberate ill equipping and lack of modernization of the
military is another aspect. If the deliberate leak of a former Army
Chief to the Prime Minister sent shock waves in the general public, the
deficiencies by themselves are drummed into the hierarchy (Prime Minster
and Defence Minister included) during the Military Commanders
Conference every six months, as also during the periodic Unified
Commanders Conference. The idea of the leak was to reinforce the
requirement of big ticket acquisitions from where hefty bribes accrue.
We neither have a National Security Strategy or an Internal Security
Strategy (latter apparent with the gross mishandling of the Maoist
insurgency) which obviates the compulsion to look at procurements
holistically. That is why we have aberrations like the over Rupees 36000
crores deal on 12 x
VVIP helicopters while there is crying need for attack and troop lift
helicopters. Arming and equipping of the soldiers at the cutting edge
continues to be ignored across the entire security sector. Ironically,
although a former Prime Minister was rumoured to be a CIA agent, no
government or media functionary has ever been labeled an ISI agent other
than low level functionaries caught for passing on military secrets.
The straight answer is there is a whole bunch of them, working in
cohorts with each other and the arms-land mafia, ensuring the military
remains unprepared and attacking the military morale.
The
standing MLA (with a feline surname) at Mathura made a beeline to the
Station Commander offering Rupees 10 lakhs (promising more would follow)
and requested the Station Commander to issue orders for all ranks at
Mathura to vote for his party.
In
2007, when the UP State elections were announced, the army garrisons at
Mathura, Allahabd and Kanpur notified the civil authorities that all
ranks posted at these garrisons fulfilling the six month criteria will
be participating in the State elections. The list of eligible all ranks
were forwarded and voter identity cards requested. Simultaneously, some
veterans took it upon
themselves to send RTIs to concerned MLAs and MPs asking for details of
what action had been taken by them in last five years for helping
veterans and serving soldiers families in their areas, and what
expenditure was made from the enormous area development funds at their
disposal to improve the infrastructure in the cantonments. The effect
was electric to say the least. The standing MLA (with a feline surname)
at Mathura made a beeline to the Station Commander offering Rupees 10
lakhs (promising more would follow) and requested the Station Commander
to issue orders for all ranks at Mathura to vote for his party. Needless
to mention that the moneybag was returned and he was politely told it
does not happen in the military like this. Eligible all ranks would vote
but everyone is unto himself and no central orders would be issued whom
to vote for. The MLA still wanted the Station Commander to keep the
moneybag but the latter declined. At Allahabad, an
illegal encroachment on cantonment land had just been removed after
proper court order. The lady heading a political party in her quest to
garner votes of the evicted rang up the party President in Delhi, who in
turn rang up the Defence Minister. Lo and behold, HQ Central Command
was asked to order an inquiry into the evictions. Obviously, nothing
came out of it but when the army informed the civil authorities they
would participate in state elections, the lady heading the particular
political party ended up wanting to know when the Divisional Commander
at Allahabad could find time to have a meal with her. Incidentally
couple of years later, this lady’s house was ransacked and burnt by
goons’ courtesy political opponents. There were demands by political
parties to hold election rallies within cantonments but this was not
permitted. The Army did take part in the 2005 UP State Elections. Civil
authorities expressed inability to issue so many voter
cards in such short span but set up separate special booths exclusive
for military where individuals vote after showing their service identity
cards. The MLA who won from Mathura, came to Station Headquarters
subsequently and queried how could he assist in improving the roads,
lighting etc over the next five years.
The
military has the power to empower itself. Will the commanders take the
initiative? Shouldn’t the Chiefs order that all ranks must not be denied their franchise? Empowerment will come a
Sir,
ReplyDeleteAny thoughts of why Desertion Policy for Jawans are not modified since last 50 years?? If a soldier is about to commit suicide and all his options failed than he Deserts... don't you think Desertion is better than committing suicide and saves Army/IAF from embarrassment??
Pity,Young subalterns are not taught Chankyas State Policy & Kautilya Shastra.Again MOD may not allow but high time Army Commander's Conference must decide the curriculum of Fresh Entrants & N nos of Intermediate Training courses on Politico/social Situation in the Country.I may not be misunderstood,But a Good Man may be intelligent.A good Fighter may be sharp but has to be trained in character of dubious Enemy
ReplyDelete