JIHADI TERRORISM-An unacknowledged warTHE INDIAN EXPRESS
Tavleen Singh : Sun Feb 24 2013, 03:02 hrs
THE BIGGEST THREAT to India's security today is jihadi terrorism. Have
you ever heard any of our political leaders acknowledge this? Have you
heard them admit that this jihad is a war against the very idea of India
and that its ultimate goal is to see
this country divided once more in the name of Islam? Have you heard
them tell the people of this country in clear terms that what the
Pakistani army did after its Kargil misadventure was arm, finance and
train Islamist groups to wage an insidious new war against India more
lethal than those fought on battlefields?
Quite
the opposite has happened since Dr Manmohan Singh's 'secular'
government came to power in 2004. On more than one occasion, senior
Congress leaders have gone out of their way to emphasise that the real
threat to India's security comes from 'saffron terrorism'. Rahul
Gandhi said this to an
American ambassador according to Wikileaks, and his political mentor
Digvijay Singh publicly promoted a book whose title was, '26/11: an RSS
Conspiracy'.
The
most recent statement of this kind came from the Home Minister himself
when he charged the RSS with running terrorist training camps. No sooner
was the statement made than the Home Minister got instant support from
Hafiz Mohammed Saeed. If
India's most wanted terrorist had listened to the Home Minister's
statement after last week's Hyderabad bombings, he would have been
totally assured that the Government of India was not serious about
fighting jihadi terrorism. All that Sushil Kumar Shinde could come up
with as words of comfort was a short catalogue of what he did in
Hyderabad. "Along with the governor, the chief
minister and other colleagues, I visited the places where the incidents
took place and then we went to the hospital and met some of the
non-critical patients. We talked to those who had suffered."
From
the Prime Minister we heard that the guilty would not go unpunished
and, from Sonia Gandhi, that she suffered pangs of sorrow and anguish.
Well, the time has come to admit that this sort of namby-pamby response
is the reason why we are no closer to winning the war against jihadi
terrorism than we
were four years ago when Mumbai was attacked. After the 26/11 attack
there should have been a concerted strategy, a robust time bound plan of
action and it is time to ask why this did not happen. Did
it not happen because of fears that it might alienate Indian Muslims?
If this was indeed the reason, then it is hard to think of a bigger
insult to them because it amounts to an admission that all Muslims
support jihadi terror.
Is this what 'secular' Congress leaders secretly believe?
If,
after the 26/11 attack, the Government of India had been serious about
winning the war against terrorism the first thing that would have
happened would have been improved policing at the lowest level. No
matter how many national intelligence agencies we set up, real
intelligence will only come when local policemen are trained in
counter-terrorism. As someone who spends much time in Mumbai I can tell
you that nothing has changed on the ground. Every
now and then, armoured cars and armed policemen appear in the streets
but this is usually to reassure visiting VIPs and not ordinary citizens.
This city is as vulnerable as it was four years ago and so is every
other Indian
city.
When
P Chidambaram was in charge of the Home Ministry, he laid a lot of
emphasis on setting up a National Investigative Agency. There is no harm
in this if simultaneously we had seen state governments cooperate by
setting up counter-terrorism units in local police stations. Without
this happening, there is not the smallest chance of India winning the
war against jihadi terror. I use the word
jihadi deliberately because I am tired of hearing politically correct
nonsense about how terrorism has no colour and no religion. It
absolutely does. When jihadi groups kill innocent people in their
cowardly war, they do it for what they believe is the
greater glory of Islam. They believe infidel lives are worthless. And,
when Hindutva groups try to counter this with their own cowardly attacks
on unarmed people in bazaars and mosques, they do it because they
believe they are defending the Hindu faith. What is not right is the
consistent effort of senior Congress leaders to portray Hindu terrorist
groups as the real threat to national security. They are not.
The
real threat to India's security comes from jihadi terrorist groups
because they are financed and trained by the Pakistani army to the point
that they act as its fifth column. Until those in charge of national
security acknowledge this, there is every likelihood that jihadi
terrorism will continue to spread its poison through the veins of
India.
Follow Tavleen Singh on Twitter @ tavleen_singh
|
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment