Sino-Indian Skirmish-1987
Skirmish between the Chinese People's
Liberation Army and Indian Army
that occurred at Sumdorong Chu Valley, with the previous one taking place almost a quarter of century earlier.
Events
leading up the near war
After her return to power in 1980 as
Prime Minister of India, Indira Gandhi ordered a general review of India's security plans. In
1982-83, she approved a plan submitted by the Chief of the Army Staff, General
K.V. Krishna Rao, to upgrade the sporadic deployment of forces along the Line
of Actual Control with the People's Republic of China.
Since the late 1960s, India had developed
an elaborate plan to defend the Himalayan frontier with China. This involved
the provision of screening defences at the Line of Actual Control, or LAC, and the building of strong defence nodes at key
points along the frontier. By the early 1980s, while the forces to man the
defences were ready, the nodes were not, and the greatest weakness was in the
fact that the servicing road network had not been built. The decision was taken
to resume the defence infrastructure construction.
Since 1962, India had not returned
to the site of its major defeat—the Namka Chu an east-west running stream which
separates the Thag La and the Hathung La ridge to its south. India's efforts to
occupy Thag La was the casus belli for the October 1962 Chinese military attack
on India. Because there were no other feasible defensive locations north of
Tawang, the government had more or less decided that in the event of a new war,
they would abandon the town and prepare for battle at the Se La pass to its
east. However, after the 1980 review, it was decided by the military
strategists that it was important to defend Tawang in a future conflict.[3]
The army made it clear that the only viable line of defence for Tawang would be
along the Hathung La ridge. In 1983, an Intelligence Bureau team went to the
pasturage of Sumdorong Chu which is north-east of the confluence of the Namka
Chu and Nyamjiang Chu. The defence forces stayed through the summer and
returned in winter. This procedure was followed for two years. In 1986, Indian
forces found that the Chinese had preceded them and set up semi-permanent structures
there.
In Feb 1986 the army nominated a new
chief, General K. Sundarji, who was determined to press the decisions taken by
General Krishna Rao. In addition, Sundarji sought government permission to
conduct an exercise named Operation Chequerboard to see how quickly troops based in the Assam plains could
take up their positions on the Sino-Indian border. As part of the exercise,
towards the end of the year, the army landed a brigade of troops at Zimithaung,
south of Hathung La using its new heavy lift Mi-26 helicopters. These forces
occupied the Hathung La, across the Namka Chu from Thag La. All this alarmed
the Chinese forces in the region; they responded with alacrity and moved up
their forces to take up positions all along the LAC. At points near this
area—Sulu La, Bum La, etc. the troops were now face to face with their Indian
counterparts. This caused concerns of Sino-Indian clashes. However, the forces
did not engage in combat.
Possibility of war
At the end of 1986, India granted
statehood to Arunachal Pradesh, which is an area claimed by China but administered by
India. The Chinese government proceeded to protest. But the military movements
in Tawang, taken in conjunction with this political action were seen
as a provocation by the Chinese. In early 1987 Beijing's tone became similar to
that of 1962, and with the Indian Army refusing to stand down, Western
diplomats predicted war.
The Indian response to the Chinese
buildup was Operation Falcon and involved movements across the
Sino-Indian border. Mi-26 heavy lift helicopters were used to deploy Infantry
fighting vehicles and tanks into North Sikkim in the east and Demchok in the
west. These deployments were viewed as particularly threatening by the PLA
because they seemed to indicate that India had moved from a strategy of defence
in its own territory to that of a larger offensive involving all of Arunachal
Pradesh.[citation needed]
The result was a thaw. Indian
Foreign Minister N.D. Tiwari arrived in Beijing in May 1987 en route to Pyongyang,
North Korea.
He carried with him messages from Indian leaders that there was no intention on
New Delhi's part to aggravate the situation. The first formal flag meeting to
discuss “ the freezing of the situation” since 1962, was held on the fifth of
August 1987 at Bum La in the aftermath of the Wangdung affair. Both sides
decided to take up talks with renewed urgency and the following year, Rajiv
Gandhi visited Beijing, returning Zhou Enlai's '60s visit.
Aftermath
Both India and China realised the
danger of inadvertent conflict and after initial posturing the decision was
made to de-escalate their deployments. The Sumdorong Chu fallout was that India
and China decided to restart their dialogue on a new and more urgent basis.
After Rajiv Gandhi's September 1988 visit, there was a hiatus of sorts because
of political turmoil in India. But finally in 1993, the two countries signed an
agreement to ensure peace along the LAC.
The agreement brought in an
interesting concept of "mutual and equal" security where
thinning of forces was envisaged, based on geographical and logistical
considerations. However, its most important element is to have the two sides
work out a mutually acceptable Line of Actual Control. As of now the two sides
have their own versions of the Line and there are points, especially in the
Sikkim-Bhutan-India Trijunction, the Sumdorong Chu area and so on where the
claims are disputed.
No comments:
Post a Comment