CHINA INCREASING ABILITY TO DELIVER NUCLEAR
WARHEADS TO U.S.
Posted August 25, 2012 by admin in
China Military
News
2012-08-25 — China is moving ahead with
the development of a new and more capable generation of intercontinental
ballistic missiles and submarine-launched missiles, increasing its existing
ability to deliver nuclear warheads to the United States and to overwhelm
missile defense systems, military analysts said this week.
Over all, China’s steady strengthening of
its military capabilities for conventional and nuclear warfare has long caused
concern in Congress and among American allies in East Asia, particularly lately
as China has taken a more assertive position regarding territorial claims in the
East China and South China Seas.
The Global Times, a newspaper directly
controlled by the Chinese Communist Party, reported Wednesday that China was
developing the capability to put multiple warheads on intercontinental ballistic
missiles, or ICBMs. But the newspaper disputed a report in Jane’s Defense Weekly
that the latest Chinese ICBM, the Dongfeng-41, had been tested last
month.
A Pentagon spokesman asked to comment did
not directly address the potential new Chinese missile capability, but said the
United States “remains committed to maintaining healthy, stable, reliable and
continuous military-to-military relations with China and regularly discusses
ways to reduce tensions and build trust in the region.”
The spokesman, Lt. Col. Damien Pickart,
said the United States carefully monitored China’s military developments and
urged China “to exhibit greater transparency regarding its capabilities and
intentions.”
Larry M. Wortzel, of the United
States-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a panel created by
Congress, said that China was developing the capability to put as many as 10
nuclear warheads on an ICBM, although dummy warheads could be substituted for
some of the nuclear warheads. The dummy warheads would have heat and
electromagnetic devices designed to trick missile defense systems, he
said.
“The bigger implication of this is that as
they begin to field a force of missiles with multiple warheads, it means
everything we assume about the size of their nuclear arsenal becomes wrong,”
said Mr. Wortzel, who is a former military intelligence officer and retired Army
colonel.
China has separately tested
submarine-launched missiles in recent weeks, which it could use to outflank
American missile detection systems, Mr. Wortzel said. Most of the radar arrays
that the United States has deployed against ballistic missiles were built during
the cold war to detect attacks over polar routes.
Sun Zhe, a professor of international
relations at Tsinghua University in Beijing, said that China was developing its
military forces only in response to continued efforts by other countries,
particularly the United States, to improve their own forces.
“We have again and again said that we will
not be the first country to use nuclear force,” he said. “We need to be able to
defend ourselves, and our main threat, I’m afraid, comes from the United
States.”
China’s development of long-range missiles
is part of a much broader military expansion made possible by rapid budget
growth in tandem with the Chinese economy, which had an output of $7.5 trillion
last year, compared with $1.2 trillion in 2000.
China began sea
trials last year for its first aircraft carrier, a retrofitted version of a
Soviet vessel, and has begun talking this summer about the eventual construction
of up to five aircraft carriers. China also began conducting fairly public
flight tests in January last year for the J-20, its new stealth fighter
jet.
The scale of China’s
strategic missile program is much more secret. The Pentagon estimates that China
currently has 55 to 65 ICBMs. China is also preparing two submarines for
deployment, each with 12 missiles aboard, Mr. Wortzel said.
Those forces are
dwarfed by those of the United States, which is cutting its inventory to 1,550
strategic nuclear weapons by 2018 under the latest arms control agreement with
Russia.
Western forecasts
vary on how many of the new Dongfeng-41 missiles China will produce, with 20 to
32 mobile launching systems planned. The mobile launchers make it harder to find
and destroy a missile before it is launched. If each missile has 10 nuclear
warheads, that could result in a few hundred to several hundred nuclear
weapons.
But Tom Z. Collina,
the research director of the Arms Control Association, said that China might not
actually deploy multiple warheads without first developing and testing smaller
warheads. And China signed the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1996, agreeing
not to conduct further nuclear tests.
The United States
has tried to reassure Russia and China that its limited ballistic missile
defenses are designed only to shoot down one or a few missiles launched by a
rogue state. But missile defense advocates in the United States favor more
ambitious, and also far costlier, systems, a spirited debate that has been
followed with nervousness in Moscow and Beijing.
The United States
has been considering where it can best place additional high-tech radar systems
designed to track ballistic missiles. American forces currently have one in
northern Japan and others that are deployed from time to time at sea. The Wall
Street Journal reported this week on discussions of whether to put two more on
land, in southern Japan and in Southeast Asia.
American officials
have repeatedly said that their main concern is North Korea, which has been
testing long-range missiles and developing nuclear weapons. But Chinese
officials and experts have been suspicious that American defense systems are
aimed at their country’s forces as well.
“I have no doubt that one of the goals of the
missile defenses is to contain threats from North Korea, but objectively
speaking, a high-tech expansion of U.S. military biceps impacts China, too,”
said Shi Yinhong, a professor of international relations at Renmin University in
Beijing. He added that discussions had taken place in China on whether to
develop missile defense systems as well.
No comments:
Post a Comment