An analysis of the recent Pak decision to handover Gwadar to China
http://southasianidea.com/geopolitics/gwadar-and-the-greater-indian-ocean/
SOUTH ASIAN IDEA
Gwadar and the Greater Indian Ocean
The recent decision of Pakistan
to handover the strategic Gwadar Part to a Chinese Company (Overseas
Part Holding) from Singapore’s
PSA (Port of Singapore Authority ) has ended
speculations of Pak-China Collaboration in the Arabian
Sea. However, it is too premature to conclude that this would
convert into a Chinese naval base anytime soon.
Naysayers precluded Chinese keenness based on the
grim security situation in Baluchistan, Indian counters at Iran’s Chabahar
Port and US
sensitivity to the Persian gulf.
Nevertheless, China
has taken the plunge despite these concerns. Theoretically, from a commercial
point of view, this would enable China
to overcome the Malacca Dilemma (apart from the New silk route through Central Asian Republics and the Kyakphyu-Kunming route
through Myanmar) and provide
it the much-needed strategic base in Arabian Sea
from a Military point of view. (Well theoretically there is nothing wrong with
the assumption but practically there are a host of imponderables which night
limit China’s
options).
Indrani
Bagchi avers that as 60% of China’s
imported oil travels through the Straits of Harmuz. Having Gwadar port under
its command would change the economic and security dynamics for China. Yes,
there would be obstacles but a persistent China, adept at infrastructure
development, can break through them. Baluchistan India and US
are the three big obstacles that may undermine conversion of this civilian port
to a Military base. Combine these with Hambantota in Srilanka, Kyakphyu in Myanmar, Chittagong
and Sonadiya in Bangladesh
(may be also Maldives) and
we have a heady mix of Chinese design for domination of the Indian
Ocean.
As outlined by Robert Kaplan in his book ‘Mansoon’,
Indian Ocean is where the interests of America,
China and India
intersect. Based on the assessment of Kaplan, perhaps what seems more plausible
at this point is that the “competitive impulses” may grow stronger. If (as Gwadar
will perpetuate) that happens then the United states and India are very
likely to find themselves working harder and more closely to balance this
asymmetry in what Kaplan calls “the Greater Indian Ocean” (Stretching eastward
from Horn of Africa, past Indian subcontinent all the way to the Indonesian
archipelago). Currently it is dominated by US which, given its pivot to
Asia-Pacific, would resist any change in strategic equations.
India’s
Karwar base (off Goa) and its interest in developing Iran’s Chabahar port (which may not come anytime
soon given India’s poor
execution record) thus would straddle Gwadar (and Karachi). While Chabahar is key to India’s Connect
Central Asia policy, experience (Kaladan Multi Modal project
in Mayanmar, Hambantota in Sri Lanka
and the Maldives
airport) tell us that the Indian inspired Chabahar will never work the way a
modern port is supposed to work. India’s
attempts to woo Oman
may offset some of the China-Pak strategic advantages but that is a big “if”.
India
thus is in a logjam. Firstly, competing with China
in the greater India Ocean without US support may be extremely
difficult. Secondly, expecting US to encourage Indian cooperation with Iran is anathema to US’s Iran policy of
the moment. Thirdly, Iran
itself may not want to alienate China
which supports its nuclear policy.
As of now, there are no firm indications
that China
would want to or be capable of (considering US concerns) convert Gwadar into a
military base. But if and when it does India
would be found wanting if it doesn’t put the larger geo strategic
alliances with US, Iran and Oman in place.
Simultaneously, it would have to vitalize its Look East policy to ensure its place under the sun
in the Greater Indian Ocean.
Relations between China
and US thus are of immense interest to India especially as a “geography
determinist” Kaplan explains how “geography determines history”. As per him,
the ‘Greater Indian Ocean’ is the essential place to contemplate the future of US power.
Unfortunately China
too feels likewise. This, despite the fact that China may not be able to take a
lead in world politics despite becoming the world’s largest economy some time
in future. However, as Odd Arne Westad warns in his book ‘Restless
Empire’, this period when China is the dominant economic
power while US remains the most powerful state shall be a dangerous
one. Westad also avers that China’s
biggest foreign challenge would be India. In fact he quotes it to be a
“very big challenge”. His comparison of the two borne out of their border
imbroglio, Tibet
and socio economic indices makes them ripe for confrontation unless governments
on both sides decide to move towards cooperation. Gwadar adds to that list of
risks.
It is here that our post China
and India or China versus India needs a revisit to
formulate pragmatic policy options which focus more on cooperation and
competition rather than confrontation.
No comments:
Post a Comment